Thursday, June 14, 2018

Hon. Atem Garang de Kuek is a man of the people

By Pal Chol Nyan

Former SPLM Chief Whip, Atem Garang de Kuek
Photo: SBS Dinka Radio
My senior colleague, Michael Koma, wrote an impressive and a touching article titled in the Dawn Newspaper: "Rebel MPs Except Honourable Atem Garang." De Kuek spoke his mind against the move by SPLM lawmakers to top up their salaries, a move rejected outright by Hon. Atem Garang, the former  Chair of the SPLM Caucus and the Chief Whip, prompting him to quit his position.


When he felt let down by his own caucus, he tendered in his resignation, which was accepted with the announcement of his successor. Hon. Atem 's argument makes a lot of sense, which to his self-seeking colleagues is a backstabbing move simply because he wants the salaries of the civil servants, the army and other organised forces increased to cope with the prevailing economic hardships. He thought he was going to win the support of his colleagues but he got disappointed.


Hon. Atem did not do anything wrong. He is a true patriot whose concern is the welfare of his people more than his belly. If that is his mistake, then he has our support as people who are subjected to abject poverty by their own leaders. Ustaz Atem Garang has glittering leadership qualities and that made him win the election by acclamation in 2010. It doesn't have to  defeat us that a member of parliament represents his people, the constituency who elected him.

Once in office, the electorates expect services but in our case, the parliamentary and the executive positions have become sources for self-enrichment and the impoverishment of the citizens by our leaders. 

Honourable MPs, you have betrayed your colleague, Hon. Atem Garang de Kuek. You wrongly believed that Hon. Atem was stirring up the situation or inciting the people, but in reality, he was defending the president because he doesn't want his people to feel bad about him and his rule. The parliament is not a place to make money; it is for legislating the laws that govern the country. If you don't raise motions to discuss bills and pass laws to empower the president, then there must be something to attract the attention of the owls or security in plain term. It is so embarrassing that the MPs failed to deliver on the promises they made during their election campaigns. 

The president needs to stay awake. There may be hidden forces at work. The father would not feel good once he has eaten and the kids are hungry. The same is applicable to the lawmakers; their job is to fight for the rights and interests of the citizens. If they don't do that, they deserve to have a vote of no confidence passed. It goes without saying that our country is let down by those who make themselves puppets and  don't speak in public but behind the scene to protect their positions. 

Get prepared. The president decided to meet his brother and an arch-rival, Dr. Riek Machar,  for a handshake. This means peace is in the offing. It should not be tampered with.


_____________________________
The author is an independent opinion writer and stands where the truth is deemed bitter. He is also a medical practitioner in South Sudan.  
Email: palcholnyan2016 @gmail.com.

____________________________________________
Editor's Note: The views expressed in this article are solely of the author not The Philosophical Refugee Site.

ON CULTURAL IDENTITY & BELONGING

Dear Melbournians, the South Sudanese people to be precise. Do you think we have seen it all? Do you think we have seen that: I mean in the aftermath of yesteryears, in regard to our culture and the notions around identity and belonging? Do you think we have seen the true reaping of what we sowed years ago? Do you really think so? After all, did we really sow anything like seeds and that there’s something to be reaped? Did we really live it out well to be seen today?

I am sorry to have bothered you, my potential readers, with questions regarding our social, economic, and political location in our host society: Australia. I think we have not seen it all and as a whole: The idea that people are bound by certain values and beliefs of significance to them. This requires cooperation and role-specific obligations on the roles of every man and woman across a given people and their society.

TOLERANCE & INCLUSION


While it is possible for us to racially discriminate or judge people we know, the chances of judging people we know diminish significantly the more we know them. An easy example of the importance of understanding others is the attitude people develop when they want to harm others or when they want to deny them something valuable. Essentially, before you fight someone, you insult them. Insults are attempts at diminishing the value of people, an attempt at estranging them, as Toni Morrison argued in The Origin of Others. It is easy to discriminate against strangers or make others strangers or dehumanized in order to discriminate against them.

Transformational Leadership, Inclusive Institutions and Service Provision

Leadership, given what is happening now in South Sudan, and generally in Africa, fascinates me. And it fascinates me not in a good way but because of the sociopolitical and socioeconomic ills facing the African continent and most of the so-called 'Third World.' To me, South Sudan, now, is a classic case.

Rebellion by disaffected politico-military leaders and repression by the government of South Sudan in Juba have stunted institutional development and leadership growth. This has made service provision almost irrelevant as political survival has taken primacy and supremacy. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

‘Black’ as an Identity Oversimplification and Mockery

Black as a universalized cultural identity of the African Person (AP)* is a residual effect of slave and colonial mentality; a racial/race paradigm. It is a malady I call, conservatively speaking, stuck-in-the-past syndrome of color constraints. Black could be an on-the-street ‘social identifier’ of race figures not a meaningful phenomenon of deep cultural identification on a universal scale.