Monday, April 22, 2019

It is preposterous to cow the minister, Dr. Nadia Arop Dudi, to reverse her decision

 By Pal Chol*

"Why is the issue of the NYU taken to become a one tribe affair knowing well that the country is inhabited by 64 tribes? Are these youths wanting to insinuate that it is their birthrights to hold that position? Do they want to confirm that it is their tribe that controls the economy and politics and to prove what is being fallaciously said of one tribe hegemony?" 

Hot on the heels of the dissolution of the National Youth Union (NYU)  whose term has elapsed and the subsequent appointment of the steering committee led by Mr. Bak Salva to prepare for the election of the new body (vide Ministerial Order), there have been some disgruntled and bigoted social media users who have been ranting to have their voices or grievances heard without any semblance of shame.

They consist of two groups, mainly our cousins from Greater Bahr el Ghazal states; those in favor and against the former president of the NYU. These Youth are sharply divided as can be seen from the venom they have been spitting in the media against one another. They have taken it upon themselves to settle their scores using the position of the NYU as a Trojan horse by stirring up the situation and calling themselves names with some even questioning the legality of the Ministerial Order. The other ethnic groups are quite and have become only spectators.

With all that borne in mind, there are pertinent questions that need to be posed and would beg answers to the satisfaction of all.

Why is the issue of the NYU taken to become a one tribe affair knowing well that the country is inhabited by 64 tribes? Are these youths wanting to insinuate that it is their birthrights to hold that position? Do they want to confirm that it is their tribe that controls the economy and politics and to prove what is being fallaciously said of one tribe hegemony? Is it only in that part of the country that there are qualified youths and eligible candidates to fill that position?

I can read between the lines that these youths who support somebody already fired are in fact against the state and they toil round the clock for its eventual downfall. They are 'decampaigning' the Head of State, something we shall not allow to happen under our watch. This has got to be very clear and must be resisted head-on should anybody or a group move towards that.

Those who call for the former leader to be reinstated are showing contempt and disrespect to the Honourable Minister of Youth, Culture and Sport, Dr. Nadia Arop; something which has never been heard of. I am being tempted to believe that there is nothing that makes courageous those who challenged the decision of the minister apart from the fact that she is seen in the way I and they know. She doesn't come from home and considered as somebody just favored and doesn't have civic rights.

Can these youths attempt with any other minister, a tribesman or a woman, and expect to get away with it without consequences in any form? This country is bigger than all of us. The youth forms the nucleus of any society. They need not be divided, used for cheaper selfish political gains and encouraged to lock horns over trivial matters among themselves. It is time for us to unite as our unity is our strength.

I am happy with some of my trusted friends, who see the truth and support the ministerial decision.
They are patriots and nationalists. I vow to stand with them through thick and thin to defend and support the minister and by extension the president. 

I call on my fellow youths all over South Sudan to let go of the past, prepare a conducive environment and ground for the election to be held and if it is won by Bak or whoever, there will be no qualms.

What is it that the former president of the NYU has forgotten to do during his tenure for him to claim that he is still the rightful leader of the NYU?

Having read the Ministerial Order and other voices, his failures surpassed his achievements. Does that need to be disputed given the legion of reasons we all saw with our naked eyes?

In brief, I just want to categorically tell my brother, whose term has expired, to accept the decision of the Minister, congratulate her for the time they spent working together, the trust vested in him and wish the new committee well in their future endeavors. 

I would also encourage him to try his luck by lobbying for any other job in the next government. He has all it takes to occupy any position.

The decision of the Hon. Minister is a fait accompli although we are hearing on the grapevine that there are big fishes leaning on the power center, who want to cow the minister into reversing her decision and reinstate the former leader. If true, it would be setting a bad precedent and it would only be a back-door politicking that must stop!

*The author is an independent opinion writer. He is also a medical practitioner in South Sudan.   To contact the author, use this email: palcholnyan2016

Editor's Note: The views expressed in the article don't reflect the views of The Philosophical Refugee Site but the author.


Dear Melbournians, the South Sudanese people to be precise. Do you think we have seen it all? Do you think we have seen that: I mean in the aftermath of yesteryears, in regard to our culture and the notions around identity and belonging? Do you think we have seen the true reaping of what we sowed years ago? Do you really think so? After all, did we really sow anything like seeds and that there’s something to be reaped? Did we really live it out well to be seen today?

I am sorry to have bothered you, my potential readers, with questions regarding our social, economic, and political location in our host society: Australia. I think we have not seen it all and as a whole: The idea that people are bound by certain values and beliefs of significance to them. This requires cooperation and role-specific obligations on the roles of every man and woman across a given people and their society.


While it is possible for us to racially discriminate or judge people we know, the chances of judging people we know diminish significantly the more we know them. An easy example of the importance of understanding others is the attitude people develop when they want to harm others or when they want to deny them something valuable. Essentially, before you fight someone, you insult them. Insults are attempts at diminishing the value of people, an attempt at estranging them, as Toni Morrison argued in The Origin of Others. It is easy to discriminate against strangers or make others strangers or dehumanized in order to discriminate against them.

Transformational Leadership, Inclusive Institutions and Service Provision

Leadership, given what is happening now in South Sudan, and generally in Africa, fascinates me. And it fascinates me not in a good way but because of the sociopolitical and socioeconomic ills facing the African continent and most of the so-called 'Third World.' To me, South Sudan, now, is a classic case.

Rebellion by disaffected politico-military leaders and repression by the government of South Sudan in Juba have stunted institutional development and leadership growth. This has made service provision almost irrelevant as political survival has taken primacy and supremacy. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

‘Black’ as an Identity Oversimplification and Mockery

Black as a universalized cultural identity of the African Person (AP)* is a residual effect of slave and colonial mentality; a racial/race paradigm. It is a malady I call, conservatively speaking, stuck-in-the-past syndrome of color constraints. Black could be an on-the-street ‘social identifier’ of race figures not a meaningful phenomenon of deep cultural identification on a universal scale.

Author's Photo Gallery - Presentations